<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citi Still Spending Money on Marketing; Facebook Will Get a Few Pennies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081124/citi-still-spending-money-on-marketing-and-facebook-will-get-a-few-pennies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081124/citi-still-spending-money-on-marketing-and-facebook-will-get-a-few-pennies/</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elo sloane</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081124/citi-still-spending-money-on-marketing-and-facebook-will-get-a-few-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>elo sloane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=1360#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Dr. Tantillo did a post on his &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; a marketing blog&lt;/a&gt; on Citigroup last week, when its stock was down at $3.77. Since he blogs from a branding angle, he tied their failed management to failed marketing, maintaining that Citigroup (like many other banks) has strayed from its banking roots: 

&quot;Leading with marketing rather than deal finance would have shown that the basic natures of a bank and an insurance company are very different, and combining them would only dilute both.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/11/22/brand-winners-and-losers-pirates-and-citigroup.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Full post &lt;/a&gt;

Any marketing by Citigroup seems ridiculous at this point, but Tantillo would say that targeted ad buys make much more sense than the &#039;big-blast&#039; campaigns. (He has railed against Super Bowl ads as a waste of money.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Tantillo did a post on his <a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv" rel="nofollow"> a marketing blog</a> on Citigroup last week, when its stock was down at $3.77. Since he blogs from a branding angle, he tied their failed management to failed marketing, maintaining that Citigroup (like many other banks) has strayed from its banking roots: </p>
<p>&#8220;Leading with marketing rather than deal finance would have shown that the basic natures of a bank and an insurance company are very different, and combining them would only dilute both.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/11/22/brand-winners-and-losers-pirates-and-citigroup.aspx" rel="nofollow">Full post </a></p>
<p>Any marketing by Citigroup seems ridiculous at this point, but Tantillo would say that targeted ad buys make much more sense than the &#8216;big-blast&#8217; campaigns. (He has railed against Super Bowl ads as a waste of money.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
