Riveting Tragedy=Boring Twitter Debate
by Peter Kafka
Posted on November 27, 2008 at 9:56 AM PT
This is now clockwork: Some kind of calamity happens somewhere. Shortly after, an Internet debate breaks out about who did a better job of breaking and/or covering the story–citizen journalists/bloggers or boring old mainstream media.
The new variation on an old theme: Does Twitter constitutes a “news” source?
If you want to read about that at length, be my guest–there’s plenty over at Techmeme. But Dave Winer has summed it up pretty well in a couple of words:
What you see on Twitter, when:
1. People witness events that others are interested in; and
2. They’re posting about it on Twitter; and
3. The interested people are reading their posts…
It certainly is news. Whether it’s journalism or not isn’t a very interesting discussion, to me.
To the user, both extremes, Twitter and the most vetted pro news, require skepticism. The reader triangulates”
The Indian police, meanwhile, seemed to take Twitter seriously, at least according to the Times “Lede” blog, which reported that cops asked that both reporters and Tweeters “do not discuss their movements, because they are concerned that the terrorists in the Taj and Oberoi Hotels are watching television to monitor the situation.”
What I haven’t seen on the blogosphere–or any news outlet–is a reasoned and thoughtful discussion of why India is seemingly beset with terror attacks. But I don’t expect to read or hear that a day after a news event, in any medium, because that’s not fast-twitch material.
Meanwhile, if you want to see what actual Twitter users are actually saying about the Mumbai attacks, head over here (even though Twitter spent some $15 million buying a search engine, it makes its search function inexplicably hard to find).
From what I can see, at this point Twitter is basically a good place to find quick links to other people’s coverage of the event, but maybe I’m missing something. (Click on image to enlarge)
[Image Credit: Stuti, which seems to have lifted the image from NDTV India]
Follow Peter on Twitter | Follow AllThingsD on Twitter
Comments
Why the manically obsessive, win-at-all costs focus on breaking a story? Seems to be a mindset that has permeated the entire news industry. Thoughtful, substantive analysis surely holds more inherent value than the scoop itself.
Posted by Jonathan Marcus at November 27th, 2008 at 1:13 pmtwitter is a group of people with zero to do who watch cnn and then claim to know something…gimme a break
Posted by Sam Harrison at November 28th, 2008 at 2:45 pmI think both things are valuable, Jonathan. And there’s always hope that some outlets can figure out how to do both.
Posted by Peter Kafka at November 28th, 2008 at 5:10 pm