<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warner Music: That "Music Tax for Colleges" Proposal Isn't Ours (Sort Of). But It Should Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081207/warner-music-that-music-tax-for-colleges-proposal-isnt-ours-sort-of-but-it-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081207/warner-music-that-music-tax-for-colleges-proposal-isnt-ours-sort-of-but-it-should-be/</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Choruss&#8217;s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Everyone Else</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081207/warner-music-that-music-tax-for-colleges-proposal-isnt-ours-sort-of-but-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Choruss&#8217;s Covenant: The Promised Land (Maybe) For Record Labels; A Lesser Destination For Everyone Else</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=1737#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>[...] An outline of Choruss’s programme was first made public by Mike Masnick in December 2008, in a blog at techdirt. Mr Masnick based his report on a PowerPoint created by Mark Luker, a vice-president at Educause. Mr Luker based his PowerPoint on discussions he had with Mr Griffin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An outline of Choruss’s programme was first made public by Mike Masnick in December 2008, in a blog at techdirt. Mr Masnick based his report on a PowerPoint created by Mark Luker, a vice-president at Educause. Mr Luker based his PowerPoint on discussions he had with Mr Griffin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dubber</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081207/warner-music-that-music-tax-for-colleges-proposal-isnt-ours-sort-of-but-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dubber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=1737#comment-845</guid>
		<description>&#039;Music tax&#039; is a nasty term, and they&#039;re right to try and dodge it. Interesting that they went straight for &#039;protection racket&#039; instead...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Music tax&#8217; is a nasty term, and they&#8217;re right to try and dodge it. Interesting that they went straight for &#8216;protection racket&#8217; instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
