<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The (Dubious) Bull Case for Magazines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Inc. Plays Chicken With Its Delivery Dudes: Check Your Newsstand For Results &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Inc. Plays Chicken With Its Delivery Dudes: Check Your Newsstand For Results &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=3499#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>[...] magazine business may go all digital one day, but right now it&#8217;s very much an ink-and-paper business. Which makes fights over how the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] magazine business may go all digital one day, but right now it&#8217;s very much an ink-and-paper business. Which makes fights over how the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nokware Knight</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Nokware Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=3499#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Print is better.  Especially since online mags really just provide short and rehashed versions of the weekly happenings you&#039;ve already seen on TV or every other website.

But especially in this economy the audience will drift towards digital because they can afford it (its mostly free) and the same with advertisers, since it is cheaper for them and the masses are drifting towards the web anyway.

Print mags will probably rebound with the economy.  They just wont have the masses they once did and will be more of a targeted play, but still more valuable due to its quality and the fact that advertisers are reaching customers that are paying for the content.  And as we know, advertisers always find consumers who already paying for something more valuable than those who are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print is better.  Especially since online mags really just provide short and rehashed versions of the weekly happenings you&#8217;ve already seen on TV or every other website.</p>
<p>But especially in this economy the audience will drift towards digital because they can afford it (its mostly free) and the same with advertisers, since it is cheaper for them and the masses are drifting towards the web anyway.</p>
<p>Print mags will probably rebound with the economy.  They just wont have the masses they once did and will be more of a targeted play, but still more valuable due to its quality and the fact that advertisers are reaching customers that are paying for the content.  And as we know, advertisers always find consumers who already paying for something more valuable than those who are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kafka</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=3499#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>The good (sort of) news: Lots of advertisers are still taking out ads in magazines, Dave. Some of them may be doing it for the reasons you list above, though I imagine most are doing it because they know how to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good (sort of) news: Lots of advertisers are still taking out ads in magazines, Dave. Some of them may be doing it for the reasons you list above, though I imagine most are doing it because they know how to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=3499#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>As a web reader and as a magazine reader, I don&#039;t understand the rush by advertisers to abandon print in favor of the web.

Print has better image quality.
Print has larger images.
Print ads can not be avoided whereas I never see any online ads thanks to AdBlock Plus and Firefox.
Print ads can contain a lot more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web reader and as a magazine reader, I don&#8217;t understand the rush by advertisers to abandon print in favor of the web.</p>
<p>Print has better image quality.<br />
Print has larger images.<br />
Print ads can not be avoided whereas I never see any online ads thanks to AdBlock Plus and Firefox.<br />
Print ads can contain a lot more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The (Dubious) Bull Case For Magazines [MediaMemo] &#124; heave-ho.org</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090126/the-dubious-bull-case-for-magazines/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>The (Dubious) Bull Case For Magazines [MediaMemo] &#124; heave-ho.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=3499#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>[...] See the original post: The (Dubious) Bull Case For Magazines [MediaMemo] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the original post: The (Dubious) Bull Case For Magazines [MediaMemo] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

