<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Web, the New York Times Really Is the Paper of Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s a matter of record&#8230; &#171; Reporting Magic City</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s a matter of record&#8230; &#171; Reporting Magic City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>[...] Surprisingly well, according to Media Memo on the All Thing Digital web site. A blog entry by Peter Kafka explains how in an interesting post linked HERE. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Surprisingly well, according to Media Memo on the All Thing Digital web site. A blog entry by Peter Kafka explains how in an interesting post linked HERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Times to the Web: Careful With Our Copy! &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Times to the Web: Careful With Our Copy! &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>[...] publishers from wishing the paper would do so. They&#8217;re hoping that the Times, which publishes the world&#8217;s best-read online newspaper, will somehow lead a charge to make it harder for aggregators to use their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publishers from wishing the paper would do so. They&#8217;re hoping that the Times, which publishes the world&#8217;s best-read online newspaper, will somehow lead a charge to make it harder for aggregators to use their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Update 2.21.09 &#124; Beth Callaghan &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Update 2.21.09 &#124; Beth Callaghan &#124; Digital Daily &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>[...] noted this week that on the Web, The New York Times (NYT) really is the paper of record, as it beats the online reach of its print counterparts almost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noted this week that on the Web, The New York Times (NYT) really is the paper of record, as it beats the online reach of its print counterparts almost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New York Times, il miglior giornale del Web 2008 - The New Blog Times</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>The New York Times, il miglior giornale del Web 2008 - The New Blog Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>[...] });     Roma - È &#8220;Il giornale dei record&#8221;: così AllThingsDigital definisce il New York Times, il quotidiano più importante degli Stati Uniti d&#8217;America a cui, con [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] });     Roma &#8211; È &#8220;Il giornale dei record&#8221;: così AllThingsDigital definisce il New York Times, il quotidiano più importante degli Stati Uniti d&#8217;America a cui, con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McNulty</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McNulty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>Nice puff piece but I don&#039;t think many people will &quot;rend&quot; their clothes when this rag goes out of business.

The Grey Lady, champion of &#039;agenda journalism&#039; and guilty of collusion to Neocon war crimes and silence over the 911 cover up has turned mainstream America away. The paper has lost its&#039; credibility. It&#039;s debt is overwhelming and it&#039;s unfair stock structure is an anathema to fair play, Joe Sixpack and free market capitalism. There are hidden issues not &quot;fit to print&quot; as well. The Times is a world class toxic polluter. A hundred years of toxic heavy metal ink has landed in the local landfills. The newspaper is so toxic bacteria can&#039;t eat it. You can dig out &#039;pristine&#039; copies from local landfills dated in the 1920&#039;s. The newspaper encouraged their readers to wrap their fish before freezing. No telling how many people died from this advice.
Thirty percent of the bulk space is taken up by this toxic sludge. Millions of gallons a day leech in NY harbor from the Fishkill site daily. Cancer clusters find their way on the map close to the landfills. Yet there is no news about the danger or how, or who will clean it up. The Times has made a living on using other people&#039;s money. They have no intention of ever cleaning up the death they put into the neighborhood landfills. The mayor&#039;s race in Jerusalem is news fit to print, not your kid&#039;s, wife&#039;s, or grandma&#039;s cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice puff piece but I don&#8217;t think many people will &#8220;rend&#8221; their clothes when this rag goes out of business.</p>
<p>The Grey Lady, champion of &#8216;agenda journalism&#8217; and guilty of collusion to Neocon war crimes and silence over the 911 cover up has turned mainstream America away. The paper has lost its&#8217; credibility. It&#8217;s debt is overwhelming and it&#8217;s unfair stock structure is an anathema to fair play, Joe Sixpack and free market capitalism. There are hidden issues not &#8220;fit to print&#8221; as well. The Times is a world class toxic polluter. A hundred years of toxic heavy metal ink has landed in the local landfills. The newspaper is so toxic bacteria can&#8217;t eat it. You can dig out &#8216;pristine&#8217; copies from local landfills dated in the 1920&#8242;s. The newspaper encouraged their readers to wrap their fish before freezing. No telling how many people died from this advice.<br />
Thirty percent of the bulk space is taken up by this toxic sludge. Millions of gallons a day leech in NY harbor from the Fishkill site daily. Cancer clusters find their way on the map close to the landfills. Yet there is no news about the danger or how, or who will clean it up. The Times has made a living on using other people&#8217;s money. They have no intention of ever cleaning up the death they put into the neighborhood landfills. The mayor&#8217;s race in Jerusalem is news fit to print, not your kid&#8217;s, wife&#8217;s, or grandma&#8217;s cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Ryan</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>The news aggregators would lose out on decent content without a New York Times. Case in point, check out the Cheat Sheet via the DailyBeast.com. There always seems to be a minimum 3 NYT.com stories.

Sure, the blog and pop culture aggregates would thrive. But depth thirsty readers can only take so much Reuters and AP visa vi Google News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news aggregators would lose out on decent content without a New York Times. Case in point, check out the Cheat Sheet via the DailyBeast.com. There always seems to be a minimum 3 NYT.com stories.</p>
<p>Sure, the blog and pop culture aggregates would thrive. But depth thirsty readers can only take so much Reuters and AP visa vi Google News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Havens</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090217/on-the-web-the-new-york-times-really-is-the-paper-of-record/comment-page-1/#comment-2482</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Havens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=4328#comment-2482</guid>
		<description>Amen. The NYT does a standout and stellar job with their online content.  

It&#039;s the reason I would pay for an annual subscription even though it&#039;s been free for all these years. Crucify me if you must, but I&#039;ll pay for quality like this on the internet.  (Are you listening, New York Times?)  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. The NYT does a standout and stellar job with their online content.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the reason I would pay for an annual subscription even though it&#8217;s been free for all these years. Crucify me if you must, but I&#8217;ll pay for quality like this on the internet.  (Are you listening, New York Times?)  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

