All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

MediaMemo

Google’s Plan to Save Newspapers: Make Them Look Better

newspaperlessGoogle CEO Eric Schmidt has already made it clear that he has no intention of bailing out the New York Times or any other newspaper with the company’s cash.

But! The company does have some free advice about how papers could help themselves. For instance–maybe they should overhaul their Web sites.

That’s what Google (GOOG) exec Jonathan Rosenberg suggests. In a novella-sized blog post–Rosenberg modestly calls it a “treatise”–published earlier this week, the senior vice president ruminates about, well, everything. As I said, it’s really long.

But Rosenberg does spend some time thinking about the ways newspapers can deliver a better online product (thanks to Slate.com for highlighting):

…the old-fashioned business model of bundled news, where the classifieds basically subsidized a lot of the high-quality reporting on the front page, has been thoroughly disrupted.

This is a problem, but since online journalism is still in its relative infancy it’s one that can be solved (we’re technology optimists, remember?). The experience of consuming news on the web today fails to take full advantage of the power of technology. It doesn’t understand what users want in order to give them what they need. When I go to a site like the New York Times or the San Jose Mercury, it should know what I am interested in and what has changed since my last visit. If I read the story on the US stimulus package only six hours ago, then just show me the updates the reporter has filed since then (and the most interesting responses from readers, bloggers, or other sources). If Thomas Friedman has filed a column since I last checked, tell me that on the front page. Beyond that, present to me a front page rich with interesting content selected by smart editors, customized based on my reading habits (tracked with my permission). Browsing a newspaper is rewarding and serendipitous, and doing it online should be even better. This will not by itself solve the newspapers’ business problems, but our heritage suggests that creating a superior user experience is the best place to start.”

If the Googlers are technology optimists, I’m a business skeptic–I think that the best place for newspapers to start is by cutting costs and generating more revenue. But maybe I’m missing something. Would a better-designed New York Times site make you more likely to, say, pay for a subscription to the New York Times? Let me know.

We’ve launched a new commenting tool, Disqus. For the full story on all of its functionality, click here. To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using Facebook Connect or Disqus—you can also log in using an existing AllThingsD account. Learn more about how Disqus collects and uses information in connection with the comments tool.
  • Newpapers/ Magazines - How to mend what isn't really broken! - 1. OWN THE SPACE - Don't Outsource anything!
    2. PRICING - Price on RELEVANCE not VOLUME & ring fence YOUR advertisers
    3. STYLE & BRAND - Don't ruin credibility by allowing third party ad involvement
    4. DON'T CHARGE FOR CONTENT - CHARGE FOR MEMBERSHIP - Monthly print glossy mag, right to comment, portable article 'banks' (for Kindle etc.), 'inner circle' blog posts etc. etc.
    5. MAKE SURE YOURS and/ or CLIENT'S ADS ARE SEXY AND RELEVANT - Give YOUR sales people something to work with by creating value slots to sell.

    Remember Little Red Riding Hood when talking to Google and the like!
  • Adam McClean
    I think that if my experience on a newspaper's Web site was tailored to my reading/viewing/commenting habits, I'd be more inclined to pay for that continued environment. Perhaps the newspaper could offer this tracking and customization feature on a trial basis. In that scenario, I'd be quite willing to ante up a little dough to continue a tailored experience, especially once I've seen how it operates.
  • alan miles
    I like the idea of making my browsing more efficient in some fashion - and might pay for that kind of feature/functionality. This is very different from paying for content per se.
  • Eric Radovan
    Interesting in light of Google exec Tim Armstrong's new local news venture (Patch) written up in Valleywag this week. Google's keeping the news industry at an arm's length, but can't seem to keep away.
  • Jim Yates
    I think this is perhaps the wrong question or, at least, not the right question.
    The Internet and the general availability of most of the content of a newspaper has changed the value proposition of a 'newspaper' over time just as the advent of TV did. While the newspapers in general have tried to use the new capability they have done it in the within their old cloak. It is a very difficult business transition and not really related just to advertising or just to content. The biggest issue I believe is whether or not 'newspapers' will appear (or can afford to appear) in print.
    To me, the Internet is the newspaper. Google adwords anybody?
  • I particularly agree with Jan Simmonds' third item.

    It astounds me that people who get paid big bucks for creating ads are capable of producing things so uncompeling. But that's subjective. Maybe what doesn't appeal to me appeals to thousands of others.

    What truly astounds is that many of these ads just plain don't work. The servers they are on are either down half the time or just so slow you give up and click the "back" button. The ads often try to do things that users have specifically disallowed, like opening up new pop-up or pop-under windows, eating up user resources without their knowledge. When you get past all of that... I'm interested, the ad actually works, the server is up, I've watched the video, I click on the "I'M REALLY INTERESTED" link in the ad and it takes me to a non-existent web page if I'm lucky this page is at least on a server owned by the company being advertised.

    To the third party ad companies: Your efforts are pathetic. Stop it!

    To the companies buying ads: Why do you keep hiring these guys?

    To the newspaper publishers: Why are you letting these companies trash your content, and settling for a smaller piece of the action in the process?

    Hasn't anyone learned the lesson that Google is trying to teach? Simple targeted text ads do just great, don't annoy users and actually produce results.
  • If Google really wants to compete they NEED to come up with an answer to the Kindle. Amazon stole that one right out from underneath their noses. Lock horns, don't beat around the bush.
  • Corey Ryan
    I would be more inclined to pay if it offered me the user experience. But this is where a device like the kindle would be useful. sometimes reading from a computer screen can be a strain. and even though my laptop is small, it's not extremely convenient to read off of on the go, like a print edition.
  • Vasanth Sridharan
    I think the first step for newspapers is making sure their Web sites work. On days when the Merc News Web site isn't working well, it makes you log in before reading each article (even after following the site's instructions to make sure that doesn't happen). And half the time the log in page doesn't load.

    It doesn't matter how good your content is if your readers get too frustrated trying to read it.
  • David Usher
    National newspapers and magazines with print distribution will die a slow death. The distribution model must quickly move to online and subscription via traditional website and electronic readers (like Kindle, et al) with and without advertising.

    The 'press' is dead for all practical purposes except for niche papers because the costs for printing and physical distribution cannot be supported by a national/international newspaper in a digital world.

    Retaining news-gathering and analysis talent is the critical component to cultivate and retain.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest MediaMemo Videos

More Videos »

About Peter

Peter Kafka has been covering media and technology since 1997, when he joined the staff of Forbes magazine. Most recently, he has been the managing editor of the tech and media Web site, Silicon Alley Insider. Read more »

Send an Anonymous Tip »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »