Twitter Search Lands (Barely) on the Map: .001 Percent Share
by Peter Kafka
Posted on June 17, 2009 at 10:02 AM PT
I’m pecking this out from the bowels of the New World Stage, where Day Two of the Twitter-centric 140 Character Conference is meandering along. But the most interesting Twitter-related news is coming from outside the conference: Data from comScore (SCOR) showing that Twitter-related search has become both measurable and meaningful.
Well, measurable, at least.
From Citigroup (C) analyst Mark Mahaney:
Twitter Becoming Meaningful–Search volume on Twitter in May was 30.1MM, (.001 percent U.S. market share), with 4.2MM searchers, and 39.4MM Result Pages, exceeding the 22.2MM searches conducted on Time Warner Cable.
Normally, we don’t even bother to dismiss companies that have less than one percent of U.S. search market. We never write about them, period. But given that Twitter boosters continually try to position the company as a real-time search engine–one that theoretically can threaten Google’s (GOOG) search monopoly, if you listen to some pitchmen, this may be the single most important metric to watch for the next few years.
It’s certainly more important than the number of Twitter followers of Oprah or even Twitter’s overall growth rate, which is going to spike up and down over the next few months as the media hop on-and-off the story (it’s back on again this week, with the Tehran protests, but we’re entering the dog days of summer, and us media folks have twitchy attention spans).
And it’s probably more important than any revenue Twitter generates over the next couple of years–the Twitter dudes have raised $55 million and have spent little of it, so they have time to create a business.
But if Twitter really is going to become an important player in search–or at least an attractive acquisition candidate for the likes of Google or Microsoft (MSFT)–it’s going to have to show a steady increase in search share.
And the nice thing about owning .001 percent of the market is that it gives you plenty of room to move up.
Comments
As someone who signed up for Twitter way back when because I sign up for everything.
As someone who ignored Twitter until April 2009.
As someone who now Tweets (every day) for 4 different business-to-business related websites.
I am convinced that Twitter is a powerful business tool.
I also think that you have to consider that it is realistically only a few months old.
Posted by Dave Barnes at June 17th, 2009 at 12:55 pmLet me make sure I understand your snobby position, Mr. Kafka. You write for a blog called All Things Digital but you make the following comment:
Normally we don’t even bother to dismiss companies that have less than one percent of U.S. search market. We never write about them, period.
So in order words, your not all things digital, your are really All Things Status Quo, correct?
(eyes rolling….)
Posted by Ed Dunn at June 17th, 2009 at 12:58 pmEd,
Posted by Dave Barnes at June 17th, 2009 at 1:44 pmShame on you.
Peter works for All Things Analog.
As you know.
,dave
Ed, surprised to see you interpret this this way. But to be clear: I meant that we normally don’t write posts talking about, say, Time Warner Cable’s share of the search market. Make sense?
Posted by Peter Kafka at June 18th, 2009 at 2:45 am