All Things Digital

Skip to main content.

MediaMemo

Is YouTube Ready for Primetime? Google Wants to Stream TV, for a Fee.

whatsinthehatchYouTube, which is already trying out the movie rental business, wants to get into TV too.

Google’s video site has been trying to convince the TV industry to let it stream individual shows for a fee, multiple sources tell me.

YouTube already lets users watch a smattering of TV shows for free, with advertising. Now it envisions something similar to what Apple and Amazon already offer: First-run shows, without commercials, for $1.99 an episode, available the day after they air on broadcast or cable.

Sources say the site’s negotiations with the networks and studios that own the shows are preliminary. But both sides seem optimistic, since models for such deals already exist. No comment from YouTube.

The biggest stumbling block may be consumers. That’s because Google (GOOG) is talking about streaming the shows instead of letting consumers download them to their computers, as both Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN) do. But the networks and studios, which control pricing, will want to sell the streamed shows at the same price as downloads; they fear that offering them at a different price will force them to go back and rework their existing deals.

Executives at YouTube and TV insist that the disparity is simply a perception problem and cite studies showing that most people who download TV episodes only watch them once, anyway. But that’s a tough sell.

It’s also possible that YouTube may skirt the issue by launching a TV rental business without the big hits that Apple and Amazon offer. One possibility: The video site could start by moving immediately to long- and mid-“tail” shows and videos that aren’t available other places and don’t have to match existing prices.

No matter how it proceeds, YouTube is likely to be just one of several outlets trying to get consumers to pay for TV on the Web in 2010.

Among others: In addition to its a la carte offering, Apple is trying to create a monthly subscription service. Hulu, the free TV site co-owned by News Corp.’s (NWS) Fox, GE’s (GE) NBC Universal and Disney’s (DIS) ABC, is expected to launch a subscription service of its own. And cable operators like Comcast (CMCSA) will be launching different versions of “TV Everywhere” services, which give subscribers expanded access to online shows.

TV executives are generally enthusiastic about all of the above, since they are meant to create additional revenue streams without threatening the industry’s existing business. That is, they’re supposed to protect existing business from the digital disruption that has ravaged music, newspapers, etc.

But while Web users have an insatiable appetite for video, they’ve yet demonstrate much interest in paying for it. If any of this is going to work, that will have to change.

We’ve launched a new commenting tool, Disqus. For the full story on all of its functionality, click here. To begin commenting right away, you can log in below using Facebook Connect or Disqus—you can also log in using an existing AllThingsD account. Learn more about how Disqus collects and uses information in connection with the comments tool.
  • Peter, granted, the pay-walls will go up on some websites, but the aggregation and filtering of free video is getting better. See the "resources" list on this research project -- Exploring TV 2.0 with the IP Video Curator http://bit.ly/6Y4WTJ
  • Mike Vegas
    Who in their right mind would pay $1.99 for a television episode?

    This is the whole problem with the music/film/television industry in the digital age. They're trying to snare analog-era profit margins. And shooting themselves in the feet in the process.
  • larrymurray
    $1.99 for a tv show vs. $1.00 for a full length movie via Redbox seems like a concept that will not succeed. Plus those clever tv people, how long before they want the $1.99 and sneak some commercials in as well!

    Television programs have their place, but they are tainted products from an entertainment standpoint with plots that build for 8 or 9 minutes and then go into neutral so commercials can be inserted.

    The model for making money may be changing, but so are those of us who begrudge television any more money when its main product is not entertainment, but advertising.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest MediaMemo Videos

More Videos »

About Peter

Peter Kafka has been covering media and technology since 1997, when he joined the staff of Forbes magazine. Most recently, he has been the managing editor of the tech and media Web site, Silicon Alley Insider. Read more »

Send an Anonymous Tip »

Ethics Statement

Here is a statement of my ethics and coverage policies. It is more than most of you want to know, but, in the age of suspicion of the media, I am laying it all out.

Read more »