Now’s the Time, Finally: Publishers Announce Their “Hulu for Magazines.” Next Up: Building It.
So here you go: The magazine industry is finally ready to announce that it is forming a joint venture to distribute and sell digital versions of its products.
There is an information-free press release at the bottom of this page, but the story is more or less the one I’ve been telling you about for a couple months:
- Time Warner’s (TWX) Time Inc and four other publishers–Condé Nast, Meredith, Hearst and News Corp. (NWS)–will be equity partners in the JV.
- For now, Time Inc. digital boss John Squires will run the unnamed JV, which is conducting a CEO search, and he would like the job on a permanent basis.
- The JV may take on other strategic or financial partners, though Squires thinks it can go forward as is without worrying about antitrust issues.
- All of this is conceptual at this stage; the companies now need to go about the business of actually assembling technology that will let them do this.
- All of those digital products that the JV’s publishers have been showing off–Condé Nast’s digital reader, built with Adobe (ADBE); Time Inc.’s mock-up of a digital magazine, etc.–are all well and good, but Squires thinks that eventually the JV will need to settle on a single standard. That’s one of the main points, really: “One would imagine a sort of common publishing infrastructure, because we don’t want to spend money five different ways.”
Some people don’t like my description of this as “Hulu for Magazines,” but let me spell it out for them: Like Hulu, this is a joint venture of content owners that is designed to control distribution and sale of their product instead of ceding that to digital powerhouses like Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN). Easy to understand, right?
The question is: Will Apple and Amazon, in particular, let others control the sale of digital media to their devices via Apple’s and Amazon’s storefronts? Publishing executives I’ve talked think that Apple may end up being receptive to the idea, but Amazon is clearly going to be a problem.
Squires notes hopefully that Amazon already lets publishers sell physical magazine subscriptions via the retailer, but that’s meaningless: Amazon has clearly designed the Kindle and surrounding infrastructure to be an end-to-end experience, and so far, the company has been able to get publishers to play along. But if Squires’s JV ends up working as planned, publishers will have enough clout to set their own terms.
LEADING PUBLISHERS FORM VENTURE TO OFFER CONSUMERS NEW DIGITAL STOREFRONT AND PORTABLE READING EXPERIENCE
Initiative Will also Offer Marketers Rich Array of Innovative Advertising Opportunities
New York, NY, December 8, 2009 – Condé Nast, Hearst, Meredith, News Corporation and Time Inc. today jointly announced that they have entered into an independent venture to develop open standards for a new digital storefront and related technology that will allow consumers to enjoy their favorite media content on portable digital devices.
The goal of this digital initiative is fourfold, to create: a highly featured common reading application capable of rendering the distinctive look and feel of each publication; a robust publishing platform optimized for multiple devices, operating systems and screen sizes; a consumer storefront offering an extensive selection of reading options; and a rich array of innovative advertising opportunities.
Beyond the publications of the equity partners, the venture will welcome other publishers to offer their content via this new digital platform. Publishers will derive revenue from content and advertising sales, as well as from print subscriptions.
“For the consumer, this digital initiative will provide access to an extraordinary selection of engaging content products, all customized for easy download on the device of their choice, including smartphones, e-readers and laptops,” explained John Squires, the venture’s interim managing director. “Once purchased, this content will be ‘unlocked’ for consumers to enjoy anywhere, anytime, on any platform.”
For publishers and advertisers, the venture will offer an attractive, cost-efficient, consumer-focused environment. Advertisers will be able to utilize innovative formats that benefit from the highly engaging, interactive nature of this new medium. In addition to entirely new magazine and newspaper reading experiences, content selections may ultimately include books, comic books, blogs and other media.
For the hardware, software and retail industries, the initiative will provide dynamic new business opportunities by organizing a library of quality content with a common format and technical specifications. The venture partners represent an unduplicated audience of 144.6 million according to Mediamark Research & Intelligence (MRI). By the end of 2010, Forrester Research estimates that 10 million e-readers will be sold in the U.S., and according to m:Metrics (comScore), there will be over 50 million smartphones in the U.S. by the end of 2010.
Comments
As content producers, people who don't actually come up with any content but who charge for it, start the process I expect this to run into:
1) problems with anti-trust issues and
2) problems with cooperation.
As long as the end result was human readable, there was no problem, not for want of the producer's trying.
Now how much you wanna bet that the Kindle's e-book files and DRM aren't compatible with the Nook's e-book files and DRM aren't compatible with … You get the idea.
Well guess what?
Until all of these files ARE compatible and the DRM is not too intrusive/restrictive, these are all non-starters.
Posted by msbpodcast at December 8th, 2009 at 8:15 pmThis is a great idea, way too long in coming.
Couple notes:
- They're not selling content.
- What they're selling (to readers) is a familiar domestic reading experience, e.g., read your copy of Met Home or Vogue over breakfast, in bed, on the train, in an airplane, or (with a waterproof e-reader) in the bathroom. That's worth money to me and a lot of other readers who esteem “having a convenient physical interaction with a portable book-like thing, but not killing trees in the process” despite also knowing how to consume content when it's jacked directly into our brains via the web.
- The math is hugely compelling. No print cost. No mail cost. Agile, largely errorless list-management. Inline opportunity to qualify and segment audience, build dynamic audiences on the fly, and even share audiences across competitive publishing spectra for business benefit. Awesome engagement metrics. Ways to capitalize on pass-along. Plus the infinite flexibility to package content for subscribers in new and exciting ways. You wouldn't buy a year's subscription to Vogue for $20? How about a subscription to Vogue US, UK, Paris, Italia for $30? How about a Fashion Package: Vogue and its four top international competitors, or “all the shelter mags” in a bundle? Benefit for the literate consumer is potentially huge, here, and there is no question in my mind these folks are going to figure out how to get money out of consumer pockets, both on a kaching-per-article basis and (more to the point) in terms of beautiful, yummy recurring charges. I'm ready to pay. My wife's ready to pay. Every literate person I know is ready to pay because we love magazines.
- The benefit to advertisers is huge. In contrast to everything we've seen on the web, where advertising feels like noise, interruption, confusion; and where navigation itself is complex and distracting (seriously — do you know anyone who _likes_ to scroll?) facing-page advertising in the classic magazine form is almost universally viewed with benevolence. Facing-page ads get read. They get calm attention from qualified readers. They enhance and punctuate, rather than interrupt and distort a reading experience made linear through classic pagination. The content and brand-engagement metrics that are going to come out of emagazines are going to blow web metrics away.
In short, there are lots of reasons why this is a great idea.
Posted by jjainschigg at December 8th, 2009 at 9:43 pmSlow moving beasts will not reshape the industry. Victory will go to the quick and nimble.
We can tag this effort with FAIL.
Posted by davebarnes at December 8th, 2009 at 10:11 pmNot as convinced as you that a magazine on a tablet is a game changer, and actually I'm a little confused about tablets in general — where do use them? They seem too big/fragile to carry with me, and when I'm home I'm very happy to read print on paper, and do my video stuff on TV and/or Web. But who knows, maybe awesome execution will convince me otherwise.
Meantime, what the publishers are doing here doesn't have that much to do with any of the above — they're just trying to make sure that if this does work that they have leverage with the likes of Apple, etc.
Posted by PKafka at December 8th, 2009 at 11:13 pmThis is dilution by amalgamation. Goodbye jobs & goodbye ad revenue!
http://blog.famebook.com/famebook/2009/10/print...
Posted by famebook at December 9th, 2009 at 8:56 amThis has been something that I've been waiting for and would gladly pay a monthly fee to get these titles…Zinio Reader already does something like this though so what's the difference? Waiting on magazines and comics to the fictional apple tablet, and paper media will die another little death,
Posted by gyasisutton at December 9th, 2009 at 9:18 amwhat happened next? no hulu exists anywhere …
Posted by sirfr at April 8th, 2010 at 10:19 am