<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MediaMemo &#187; ad:tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/tag/adtech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dear FTC: Is This the Kind of Thing You Want Me to Disclose?</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad:tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones Code of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glengarry Glen Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A marketer offers to pay me per post. I don't know whether to be flattered or offended.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go back and forth on the new <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090622/adding-an-amazon-or-apple-affiliate-link-to-your-blog-the-feds-want-to-know/">blogger disclosure rules</a> the Federal Trade Commission rolled out last week. Part of me thinks the agency is trying to boil the ocean, and without any good reason&#8211;even if a blogger runs a post at the behest of a sleazy marketers, who really cares? On the other hand, there really are some sleazy marketers out there, so many that letters like this one, which popped into my inbox this morning, don&#8217;t even raise an eyebrow:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>My name is [Redacted] and I’m working with the ad:tech team on the social media outreach and promotion for ad:tech New York. ad:tech recognizes that you are a key influencer in the digital marketing community, and as such, I’d like to see if you are interested in a promotion exchange.</p>
<p>ad:tech will provide:</p>
<ul>
<li>Twitter announcement of your involvement with ad:tech New York to our 6,800+ followers.</li>
<li>Your choice of: a free pass to the exhibit hall (valued at $35) or 35% off a full conference pass.</li>
</ul>
<p>*If you are already registered or can’t make it to the event, you can offer it as a prize to your network, give it to a friend or client&#8230;.It is completely transferrable.</p>
<p>We ask you provide:</p>
<ul>
<li>No less than 3 posts about ad:tech New York on Twitter, Facebook or your blog. Suggested postings: a session you’re interested in, why you like ad:tech, the exhibitors that you want to see or technologies that you are interested in learning about. What you share is up to you&#8211;it just needs to be posted by November 1.</li>
</ul>
<p>Interested in writing a blog post and would like additional information on ad:tech? Quotes, photos, interviews, ideas, etc. will happily be offered with request.</p>
<p>To redeem the offer:<br />
Share 3 posts about ad:tech, then email me, [X]@ad-tech.com, with links/screenshots by November 1.</p>
<ul>
<li>Tell me how you’d like ad:tech to promote your involvement with the event at the show.</li>
<li>Let me know if you’d like the free expo pass or the 35% discount on the conference.</li>
</ul>
<p>Please let me know if this is something that you are interested in or if you have any questions?</p>
<p>Thank you for your continued support of ad:tech. I hope to meet you in New York!</p>
<p>[Redacted]<br />
Social Media Outreach<br />
ad:tech</p></blockquote>
<p>Well. Flattery is always a nice approach, so I&#8217;m pleased to hear about my influencer status. Also, it&#8217;s nice that the ad:tech team is willing to provide &#8220;ideas&#8221; for me upon request.</p>
<p>Alas, even if I wanted to take ad:tech up on its offer, the <a href="http://dowjones.com/codeconduct.asp">Dow Jones Code of Conduct</a> would prevent me from doing so.</p>
<p>But this letter <em>does</em> generate two questions for me:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is my work nearly worthless? Or pretty valuable? Three posts is a little less than a day&#8217;s work for me. Ad:tech says that&#8217;s worth either $35 (a free expo pass) or up to $558 (35 percent of the highest price for an ad:tech conference pass). That&#8217;s a big swing!</li>
<li>I know there are a lot of &#8220;social media experts&#8221; out there, because there are a lot of them following me on <a href="http://twitter.com/pkafka">Twitter</a>. But I don&#8217;t really know what they do. Is this it? That can&#8217;t be right. Can it?</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyway, this kind of thing always makes we want to pull up a &#8220;Glengarry Glen Ross&#8221; clip. There isn&#8217;t a direct connection, mind you. Just a vibe.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="212" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y3EvCIU7gb8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="212" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y3EvCIU7gb8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Ads to the Rescue? Not for a While</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081106/mobile-ads-to-the-rescue-not-for-a-while/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081106/mobile-ads-to-the-rescue-not-for-a-while/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad:tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Meeker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaPost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are plenty of people--from Google on down--waiting for marketers to start shoveling money into phone advertising. But it's not going to happen in the next few years, as advertisers stick to markets they already understand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/phone.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-706" title="phone" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/phone-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="112" height="150" /></a>One of the few glimmers of hope in Mary Meeker&#8217;s <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081106/mary-meekers-entire-bummer-powerpoint-on-her-internet-outlook/">bummer of a presentation on the Internet ad market</a>&#8211;mobile. And the thesis is the same as the one we always hear about mobile: There are lots of eyeballs looking at phones, and there are more of them every day. It&#8217;s a huge, fast-growing and basically untapped ad market.</p>
<p>But while there are plenty of people&#8211;from Google (GOOG) on down&#8211;waiting for marketers to start shoveling money into phone advertising, it has yet to happen. And it&#8217;s certainly not going to happen in the next few years, as advertisers stick to markets they understand already. <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&amp;s=94186&amp;Nid=49090&amp;p=918739">MediaPost</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="articleText">Quentin George, president, global digital strategy and marketing innovation at Universal-McCann, agreed that marketers are likely to be less adventurous in exploring newer platforms in the midst of a severe downturn. Even if funding for more experimental campaigns doesn&#8217;t completely dry up, projects will take longer to complete. &#8216;A cool idea that might have taken two months to complete might now take six or nine months,&#8217; he said.</p>
<p class="articleText">The grim outlook for ad spending into next year is bad news for much-hyped categories such as mobile and digital out-of-home advertising. &#8216;With the economy the way it is, (mobile) is one of the least areas clients are going to be looking at because it&#8217;s more of a test-and-learn situation,&#8217; Speciale said.</p>
<p class="articleText">Bob Thacker, senior vice president of advertising and marketing for OfficeMax, compared mobile to soccer: &#8216;It&#8217;s popular in the rest of the world, but we haven&#8217;t learned how to play it yet.&#8217; From a media-buying perspective, Matt Spiegel, CEO of Digital Omnicom Media Group Digital, added that mobile is &#8216;just complex to buy at scale.&#8217; Couple that complexity with more austere budgets and mobile becomes even less desirable as an ad option.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="articleText">[<em>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aussiegall/279804967/">aussiegall</a></em>]</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081106/mobile-ads-to-the-rescue-not-for-a-while/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimism Meets Reality: On the Ground at ad:tech</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081104/optimism-meets-reality-on-the-ground-at-adtech/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081104/optimism-meets-reality-on-the-ground-at-adtech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad:tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddy Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Lazerow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Amusements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ned Desmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online advertising may be slowing, but that isn't putting a damper on one of the industry's biggest trade shows. An insider offers tips on how to navigate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/ad-tech.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-586" title="ad-tech" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/ad-tech.png" alt="" width="375" height="68" /></a>There&#8217;s an ongoing debate about how bad the online ad market has become and will get (your choices: <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081103/how-low-will-online-ads-go-lower-says-jp-morgan-very-very-low-says-gawkers-nick-denton/">less good, bad or very bad</a>). But that isn&#8217;t stopping the organizers of ad:tech from putting on their annual, um, advertising and technology show this week.</p>
<p>This should be a good place to gauge the state of the industry, but it&#8217;s also a dizzying one: There are a couple hundred booths and dozens of panels to navigate. So MediaMemo asked an <a href="http://www.ad-tech.com/ny/">ad:tech</a> veteran for a guide: Mike Lazerow, whose <a href="http://www.buddymedia.com/">Buddy Media</a> specializes in getting big brands to advertise on social networks like Facebook and News Corp.&#8217;s (NWS) MySpace.</p>
<p>Lazerow&#8217;s first suggestion was to catch CNN president Jon Klein&#8217;s keynote this morning. But voting lines nixed that idea (suggestion for next time&#8211;Brooklyn district 91 needs more voting machines). Other highlights from Lazerow&#8217;s itinerary:</p>
<blockquote><p>Another must-see keynote is the &#8216state of the industry&#8217; on Tuesday, moderated by Internet Advertising Bureau chief Randall Rothenberg. I usually stay away from any panel featuring five people with giant titles on the same stage together. But Randall is an uber-sharp strategist and thought-leader and promises to lead a compelling panel discussion that aims to cut through the noise of the digital marketing world.</p>
<p>&#8230; By far the most compelling Data panel is Wednesday’s <a href="http://www.ad-tech.com/ny/session_detail.asp?refad=1&amp;session=883">&#8216;The Future of Measurement&#8211;How Do We Define the New Media Currency?&#8217;</a> David Hallerman, a senior analyst at eMarketer, hosts leaders of the major metrics firms, Nielsen Online, Hitwise, comScore, Quantcast and Microsoft’s Analytics and Atlas Institute. The focus of the panel will be how to create universal metrics to gauge the success and determine the pricing of all digital media that Google doesn’t hold a claim to. I encourage the panelists to grab a drink with each other afterward to move closer to common metrics. &#8230;</p>
<p>The ad network panel that will be most interesting is Thursday’s late-afternoon session <a href="http://www.ad-tech.com/ny/session_detail.asp?refad=1&amp;session=898">&#8216;So Many Networks, So Little Time: Analyzing the Digital Network Landscape,&#8217;</a> hosted by David Joseph, head of the interactive entertainment research group at Morgan Stanley.</p>
<p>The real title of the panel should be &#8216;Online Ad Networks: Why There Are Too Many and Why They Will Be Out of Business Soon.&#8217; While the world wants another ad network as much as I want my third heart surgery, these buy-siders will help sift through the confusion of the already over-crowded ad network space.</p>
<p>&#8230; For the most part, avoid all panels that have &#8216;innovation,&#8217; &#8216synergy&#8217; and &#8216;dispatches from&#8217; in the title. Stick with panels featuring companies that HAVE money (agencies, brands) and not companies that are selling solutions (startups, vendors and the major ad networks and sites). What matters is what the brands and agencies are buying, not what we want to sell them!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And yes, Lazerow is on a panel himself: <a href="http://www.ad-tech.com/ny/session_detail.asp?refad=1&amp;session=887">&#8220;Mobilizing and Leveraging Consumer Insights: Best Practices for the Digital and Social Media Age&#8221;</a> kicks off at 2:45 p.m., and he assures me the discussion will be more interesting than the name. See you there.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081104/optimism-meets-reality-on-the-ground-at-adtech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>