<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MediaMemo &#187; editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/tag/editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>by Peter Kafka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does Your Mom Edit Your Blog? Google Wants to Know.</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091105/does-your-mom-edit-your-blog-google-wants-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091105/does-your-mom-edit-your-blog-google-wants-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyeballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nieman Journalism Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zachary Seward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did Google start labeling blogs as "blogs" in its search results? Eric Schmidt thinks it may have to do with your mother.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/mom.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-12842" title="mom" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/mom-250x216.jpg" alt="mom" width="250" height="216" /></a>Do a Google news search, for say, <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=will%20ferrell&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn">&#8220;Will Ferrell,&#8221;</a> and you&#8217;ll see that the search giant has started labeling news items from blogs as&#8230;news items from blogs. Why?</p>
<p>Turns out Google (GOOG) CEO Eric Schmidt isn&#8217;t quite sure himself.</p>
<p>But posed with that question during a Boston news conference yesterday, Schmidt did use the opportunity to expound on the difference between pro bloggers and amateur ones. Or at least, his vision of the difference.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/11/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-envisions-the-news-consumer-of-the-future/">Nieman Journalism Lab blogger Zachary Seward&#8217;s transcript</a> of his exchange with Schmidt:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>Me: A very small question. Google News very recently added a label for blogs, to differentiate from non-blogs. It seemed weird in 2009 to make that distinction. I wondered, did you have any input on that or &#8211;?</p>
<p>Eric Schmidt: I was not directly involved in that. There seems to be a difference between blogs and traditional news. It’s sometimes hard to distinguish because many people in the traditional news are also bloggers.</p>
<p>Me: Or they use a blog platform.</p>
<p>Schmidt: Or they use a blog platform. So we’re trying to find that line. And it’s hard to articulate what that difference is.</p>
<p>Me: How would describe that line if it’s not based on the tech behind the publishing platform?</p>
<p>Schmidt: No, it’s not the technology. My guess is&#8211;again, I’m speculating, which is always a mistake&#8211;it has a lot to do with the infrastructure around the writer. So a blog that’s associated with a major, legitimate organization&#8211;of which, I think, the majority, if not everyone, in the room is associated with&#8211;would be, I think, treated differently than an individual blogger who’s using his or her right of free expression to say whatever he thinks. So the presence of an editor, as an example. You know, an editor that’s not your mom.</p></blockquote>
<p>As Seward points out, Schmidt is wrong about the way Google News categorizes. As best I can tell, Google basically lumps all blogs, including this one, which I like to think of as reasonably professional, in its &#8220;blog&#8221; category. And no, despite her <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090807/the-outage-aftermath-louie-swisher-hearts-facebook-but-twitter-not-so-much/">occasional</a> <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090904/if-some-dads-rants-on-twitter-can-go-viral-my-mom-needs-to-turbo-tweet/">appearances</a> on this site, Kara Swisher&#8217;s mother is not an editor here.</p>
<p>Anyway, the real question for me isn&#8217;t &#8220;how does Google refer to my work in its search results?&#8221; but &#8220;how does Google determine where to put my my work in its search results?&#8221; Schmidt and company can call it whatever they want&#8211;just send those eyeballs my way.</p>
<p><em>[image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pagedooley/2483895370/">kevindooley</a></em>]</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091105/does-your-mom-edit-your-blog-google-wants-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BusinessWeek Explains Why BusinessWeek Is for Sale: It's a Money Pit</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090724/businessweek-explains-why-businessweek-is-for-sale-its-a-money-pit/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090724/businessweek-explains-why-businessweek-is-for-sale-its-a-money-pit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Wasserstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BusinessWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Gate Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=9685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, a top BusinessWeek editor assured me that McGraw-Hill wouldn't part with the publication--because even if it was losing money it was still a trophy asset for the publisher. But perhaps my source didn't comprehend how much money his employer was actually losing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files//2008/12/dark-knight-burning.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1583" title="dark-knight-burning" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files//2008/12/dark-knight-burning-247x300.jpg" alt="dark-knight-burning" width="164" height="200" /></a>Earlier this year, a top BusinessWeek editor assured me that McGraw-Hill wouldn&#8217;t part with the publication&#8211;because even if it was losing money, it was still a trophy asset for the publisher. But perhaps my source didn&#8217;t comprehend how much money his employer was actually losing.</p>
<p>Now we know. BusinessWeek&#8217;s Jon Fine talks to people who have seen the black book for BusinessWeek, which McGraw-Hill (MHP)  has indeed put on the block. The numbers are brutal. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jul2009/db20090723_350469.htm">Fine</a>:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>The data state that BusinessWeek lost around $20 million on revenues of $147 million in 2008, and that slightly smaller losses are projected in 2009 on revenue of around $135 million. These losses do not, however, include key corporate overhead items, such as rent and certain infrastructure-related costs. When all those items are factored in, the total loss figure essentially doubles, said two executives who saw the data.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not surprisingly, those numbers seem to have scared off every traditional publisher that might be a logical buyer. The list of nonacquirers includes Time Warner&#8217;s (TWX) Time Inc., News Corp. (NWS) (which owns this Web site), Bloomberg and Thomson-Reuters (TRI).</p>
<p>So who does want this thing? Fine suggests that Open Gate Capital, the private equity firm that bought TV Guide for $1 plus debt last year, may be up for a similar transaction. Another possibility: Billionaire Bruce Wasserstein, who&#8217;s already shown a penchant for high-profile properties, like New York magazine.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090724/businessweek-explains-why-businessweek-is-for-sale-its-a-money-pit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Dupe The New York Times: A Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081223/how-to-dupe-the-new-york-times-a-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081223/how-to-dupe-the-new-york-times-a-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertrand Delanoë]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter to the editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper of record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has a staff big enough to verify the authenticity of every letter to the editor. But it still got hoodwinked by someone pretending to be the mayor of Paris.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/pepelepeu.jpg"><img src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/pepelepeu.jpg" alt="" title="pepelepeu" width="227" height="262" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2396" /></a>The New York Times (NYT) admits that it has been duped by someone who pretended to be the mayor of Paris. How did the duper ever get one over on The Paper Of Record? By writing a letter to the editor. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/22/opinion/l22kennedy.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=delanoe&amp;st=cse">NYT</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Editors&#8217; Note: December 22, 2008<br />
Earlier this morning, we posted a letter that carried the name of Bertrand Delanoë, the mayor of Paris, sharply criticizing Caroline Kennedy.</p>
<p>This letter was a fake. It should not have been published.</p>
<p>Doing so violated both our standards and our procedures in publishing signed letters from our readers.</p>
<p>We have already expressed our regrets to Mr. Delanoë&#8217;s office and we are now doing the same to you, our readers.</p>
<p>This letter, like most Letters to the Editor these days, arrived by email. It is Times procedure to verify the authenticity of every letter. In this case, our staff sent an edited version of the letter to the sender of the email and did not hear back. At that point, we should have contacted Mr. Delanoë&#8217;s office to verify that he had, in fact, written to us.</p>
<p>We did not do that. Without that verification, the letter should never have been printed.</p>
<p>We are reviewing our procedures for verifying letters to avoid such an incident in the future.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Expect this story to generate a lot of <em>new media rulz!</em> from the blogosphere. But you can file that in the same place you put the &#8220;Twitter is like a news wire, <em>only better!</em>&#8221; arguments. I&#8217;m just glad the Times can afford to have a staff big enough to verify the authenticity of every letter it prints. And I worry that this won&#8217;t be the case in the near future.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081223/how-to-dupe-the-new-york-times-a-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Not-Bad News From Time Inc.: People.com Booming</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081210/more-not-bad-news-from-time-inc-peoplecom-booming/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081210/more-not-bad-news-from-time-inc-peoplecom-booming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashlee Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronx Mowgli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Baby Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Zucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Golin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMZ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=1939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it's true that Time Warner's magazine unit is embattled, there are bright spots in the portfolio. Take People.com: The gossip magazine has always been one of Time Inc.'s strongest performers. Now its companion site is, too. Who gets credit? Some of it goes to celebs like Ashlee Simpson, and their babies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/ashlee_simpson.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1948" title="ashlee_simpson" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/ashlee_simpson.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="266" /></a>That was fun writing <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081209/holiday-cheer-from-time-inc-layoffs-nearly-done/">not-bad news from Time Inc.</a> yesterday. Let&#8217;s try it again:</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that Time Warner&#8217;s (TWX) magazine unit is embattled, there <em>are</em> bright spots in the portfolio. Take <a href="http://www.people.com/people/">People.com</a>: The gossip magazine has always been one of Time&#8217;s strongest performers (good luck trying to find a discounted subscription). Now its companion Web site is, too.</p>
<p>The site boasts 8.6 million unique monthly visitors, per comScore (SCOR), up 36 percent in the last year, and generates a staggering 700 million page views per month&#8211;per Omniture (OMTR). Meanwhile, once-hot sites like TMZ.com (another Time Warner property) have <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/tmz.com+people.com/?metric=uv">tailed off</a>.</p>
<p>Much of the credit for that goes to Mark Golin, the awesomely sharp and frumpy editor best known as the man behind Maxim magazine&#8217;s rise, way back in the late 1990s. He&#8217;s successfully broadened the site beyond just Britney/Paris/Lindsay news by adding features like a game channel, a shopping channel and the like.</p>
<p>One of the most successful expansions came via acquisition: When People.com bought <a href="http://www.celebrity-babies.com/">Celebrity Baby Blog</a> back in May, it was generating <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/30/celebrity-baby-blog-is-acquired-peoplecoms-gain-is-fm-publishings-loss/">6.9 million page views per month</a>. Now it&#8217;s doing 30 million, Time execs say. And before my fellow journobloggers dismiss the work that the people at Celebrity Baby Blog do, ask yourself this: Did <em>you</em> know that Ashlee Simpson has named her kid <a href="http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/12/ashlee-simpso-1.html">Bronx Mowgli</a>? Aren&#8217;t you glad you know now?</p>
<p>In any case, all those page views are translating into actual dollars&#8211;not digital pennies, as NBC&#8217;s Jeff Zucker would say. Time Inc. says People.com is now one of its 10 most profitable titles&#8211;that&#8217;s out of all of the company&#8217;s 174 properties, on or offline.</p>
<p>The company won&#8217;t attach numbers to that claim, of course. But given that Time Inc. generated $162 million in operating profit during a very lousy third quarter, you can get some sense of the property&#8217;s success. Now Time just needs many more just like it.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081210/more-not-bad-news-from-time-inc-peoplecom-booming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[UPDATE] Time Inc. Layoffs: Publishers, Top Execs at Southern Progress and Cooking Light Out</title>
		<link>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081119/time-inc-layoffs-cottage-living-yesterday-hundreds-today/</link>
		<comments>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081119/time-inc-layoffs-cottage-living-yesterday-hundreds-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Larson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capell's Circulation Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coastal Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooking Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coordinator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cottage Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cottage Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cottage Makeovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cottageliving.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Gardner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Graff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karla Hardy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Notable Launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsstand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxmoor House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink slip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Farmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samir Husni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Accents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Living at HOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Living Classics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sylvia Auton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triple Play Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Green]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Inc. is cutting something like 600 employees, but for the past few weeks it has been doing so in small steps: 10 here, 30 there. That will change today when up to 250 people at Time Warner's magazine unit are expected to get pink-slipped. Leaving the company along with them, executives from Cooking Light and Southern Progress.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Inc. is cutting something like 600 employees, but for the past few weeks it has been doing so in small steps: <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081114/more-time-inc-cuts-instyle-web-exec-plus-reader-mail/">10 here</a>, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081114/time-inc-layoff-update-30-from-essence-entertainment-weekly-many-more-to-come/">30 there</a>. That will change today, reports the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11192008/business/the_worst_of_time_s__for_250_139439.htm">New York Post&#8217;s Keith Kelly</a>, when up to 250 people at Time Warner&#8217;s (TWX) magazine unit are expected to get pink-slipped.</p>
<p>Kelly&#8217;s number for today &#8220;may be on the high side,&#8221; a person familiar with the matter counsels me. In any event, I expect to have more details later in the day. As always, I value your input, and I keep all correspondence anonymous: <a href="mailto:peter@allthingsd.com">peter@allthingsd.com</a>.</p>
<p>In the meantime, an update on this week&#8217;s cuts: I&#8217;m told Time Europe editor William Green and senior editor James Graff were laid off via phone yesterday, and that more cuts in the London office are expected today. And four-year-old Cottage Living magazine has been shut down, which means that 38 out of 47 people who worked on that title are out of work; the remainder will be placed elsewhere in the group. Announced along with the job cuts today were the departures of executives from Cooking Light and Southern Progress. Chris Allen, Senior Vice President and Publisher of Cooking Light is resigning his position, as are Southern Progress execs Bruce Akin, Karla Hardy and Dick Gardner. Here are the memos:</p>
<blockquote><p>November 18, 2008</p>
<p>To:Time Inc. Employees<br />
From:Sylvia Auton<br />
Re: Cottage Living Magazine</p>
<p>I regret to inform you that we will no longer be producing Cottage Living magazine. The November/December 2008 issue, on newsstands now, will be the magazine’s last. Cottageliving.com will also shutdown. However, the company will keep the brand alive in one of its other leading shelter titles and these plans will be finalized over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>Since its inception, Cottage Living attracted significant advertiser support and fostered a loyal following among readers. However, the economic downturn has particularly affected the shelter market and while the brand was genuinely loved by readers and advertisers alike, the economy inhibited its ability to grow and therefore, sadly, we had to make the decision to close it.</p>
<p>Cottage Living launched with a unique editorial mission. Its readership celebrated community and character over conformity, personality rather than perfection, and informality instead of pretension. The brand’s tagline: &#8216;life just right,&#8217; showed how one could ‘live large,’ even luxuriously, in a lighter footprint.</p>
<p>Launched in September 2004 with a circulation of 500,000, the brand quickly grew to 650,000 in January/February 2005. One year later, Cottage Living increased its rate base to 900,000, and then to one million in January/February 2007. Cottage Living also produced many one-time special-interest publications including Cottage Christmas and Cottage Makeovers.</p>
<p>Cottage Living also received many industry accolades including AdWeek’s &#8216;2005 Startup of the Year&#8217; and Advertising Age’s &#8216;2005 Launch Worth Watching.&#8217; It was also named to AdWeek’s &#8216;Hot List&#8217; 10 Under 50 list for two consecutive years: 2006 and 2007.</p>
<p>I want to thank the many dedicated and talented Cottage Living staffers. It was developed, edited and published by some of the best talent in the business and we can remain proud of its many achievements.</p>
<p>S.A.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<hr />
<blockquote><p>
Subject: Staff Announcement<br />
To:       Lifestyle Business Unit Employees<br />
From:   Sylvia Auton and Steve Sachs<br />
Re:       Staff Announcement  </p>
<p>With the departure of Bruce Akin, we’re pleased to announce that Bruce Larson will assume the role of Senior Vice President and the lead executive in charge of SPC operations for Time Inc. He will be responsible for the general management of all operations in the Birmingham office, Oxmoor House and Southern Living at HOME. </p>
<p>Bruce joined the company in 1991 as a manager of corporate reporting. Over the last 17 years he has been promoted numerous times and has held jobs in a variety of areas, from corporate accounting to IT to consumer marketing and production.</p>
<p>During his tenure with Southern Progress, Bruce has shown outstanding decision-making and leadership skills and has been a key player responsible for the strong financial growth the company has enjoyed over the years. </p>
<p>Please join us in congratulating Bruce on his new assignment.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<hr />
<blockquote><p>
To:  Southern Progress Colleagues<br />
From:  Bruce Larson </p>
<p>I regret to announce that two longtime, trusted Southern Progress colleagues, Karla Hardy and Dick Gardner, have decided to retire at the end of the year. </p>
<p>Karla has been a steady presence in our advertising production circles ever since she joined the company in 1977 as advertising traffic manager for Progressive Farmer. In 1985, she accepted a position as assistant to the editor and advertising/production coordinator for Southern Living Classics, which merged later that year with the newly acquired Southern Accents, where she eventually moved up to advertising production manager. When we launched Coastal Living, Karla began working on both titles, and in 2007 she began helping manage advertising production for Cottage Living as well. And let’s not forget her work on Entrée. With her incredible depth of knowledge of advertising production and her keen eye for detail, it’s no wonder that Karla is so highly regarded. She knows how to best position each ad for space efficiency and visibility, and she knows how to work with our sales staff and advertisers to ensure that everyone is happy with the outcome. </p>
<p>Dick began his Southern Progress career just nine months after Karla, back in 1978. He spent the first 13 years of his SPC career on the corporate side, managing building operations, office services, and purchasing, before moving to the magazine side of the business as financial manager for Southern Living and Southern Accents. In 1995, he was named general manager of Southern Accents. One short year later, he added responsibility for the soon-to-be-launched Coastal Living. In 2004, he was named vice president and general manager for Coastal Living alone, and in 2007 he took on the GM role for Cottage Living as well. Dick is well respected for his wisdom, leadership. and kindness, not to mention his astute business sense. He knows his titles—and his staff—inside and out and never fails to find the right solution to any challenge. Plus, he has a great sense of humor. </p>
<p>There have been several times over the years when both Dick and Karla have been counted on to work on more than one title—a sure sign of how highly they’re valued around here—and each did so while managing to maintain a positive, calm outlook. Please join me in thanking them for all they’ve done for us and letting them know how much they’ll be missed.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<hr />
<blockquote><p>
Subject: Staff Announcement<br />
To: Lifestyle Business Unit Employees<br />
From:  Sylvia Auton<br />
Re:  Staff Announcement </p>
<p>After careful consideration, Chris Allen, Senior Vice President and Publisher of Cooking Light, has decided to leave the company.</p>
<p>A 26-year veteran, Chris first joined Cooking Light in 1991 as eastern advertising sales director and quickly rose through the ranks. Chris’ leadership and expertise resulted in enormous successes for the Cooking Light brand: Under his direction, Cooking Light has grown to become the world’s largest epicurean and healthy lifestyle magazine. </p>
<p>During his tenure, Cooking Light was named to AdWeek’s Hot List four times, Advertising Age’s &#8216;A List,&#8217; Capell’s Circulation Report’s prestigious &#8216;Triple Play Award&#8217; three times, and &#8216;Most Notable Launch of the Past 20 Years&#8217; awarded by Media Industry Newsletter and Samir Husni in 2005. Chris also presided over the launch of several groundbreaking marketing campaigns, including The Cooking Light Cruise, the Cooking Light Fit House, and Cooking Light Supper Clubs.</p>
<p>An avid cook and exercise enthusiast, Chris lived the Cooking Light brand. He’s also a rock star: The Cooking Light band, Way Past Close, has performed throughout New York City and Birmingham to clients and colleagues.</p>
<p>Earlier in his career, Chris spent eight years at PEOPLE rising from salesperson to New York divisional sales manager. </p>
<p>Please join me in thanking Chris for his many contributions to Southern Progress and Time Inc. and wishing him the very best.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081119/time-inc-layoffs-cottage-living-yesterday-hundreds-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>